• User Name
  • Password
  • Remember Me
27 Mar 2017, 23:52 HRS IST
A 21-year-old Austrian tourist allegedly molested by a massage parlour owner in Udaipur in RajasthanSC reserves judgement on the appeals filed by four death row convicts in the December 16, 2012 gangrape and murder caseSensex drops 184.25 points to end at 29,237.15; Nifty falls 62.80 points to 9,045.20Kolkata to host Under-17 Football World Cup final in OctoberSC asks Centre to consider effective means other than pellet guns to quell agitating mobs in Jammu and Kashmir as it concerns life and deathKerala government decides to order judicial probe into allegations of sexual misconduct against A K SaseendranSensex trips 97 points, Nifty below 9,100 on global weaknessRupee climbs 28 paise against dollar in early tradePak intruder shot dead along Pak border in Punjab
  • PTI
Suspected militants open fire on house of two policemen, who are brothers, in Shopian district of Kashmir; no one injured.
  • SC junks PIL against reservation

  • Advertisement
  •  Share
  • Print Print
  •  E-mail
  • Comments Comment
  • [ - ] Text [ + ]
20:3 HRS IST

New Delhi, Mar 20 (PTI) The Supreme Court today junked a PIL seeking a direction that reservation on the basis of caste, sex, religion and financial status should be removed from the Constitution.

A bench comprising Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justices D Y Chandrachud and S K Kaul rejected the plea filed by a chartered accountant who claimed that reservation was against the law laid down by the Constitution.

"Reservation is for those who are not in a position to walk shoulder to shoulder with the communities which are advanced. The original provisions of the Constitution cannot be challenged...Your fundamental understanding is not correct.

We can't agree with you. Go get yourself elected and tell the Parliament," the bench said.

The top court was hearing a PIL filed by chartered accountant Waman Dattatray Damle seeking directions that reservation on the basis of caste, sex, religion and financial status should be removed from Constitution.

  • Post your comments